Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
https://crash.limetech.org/dm4nfwy3xbla |
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
That doesn't look related to any aforementioned changes. If you can reproduce the crash please file a bug @ https://bugs.alliedmods.net/
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Can the builds page show the build date?
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Im on a mobile device. That would explain why i couldn't see it
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Anther Issue I have with this system is, things making it to the stable branch aren't really as tested and polished as they should be. There is no intermediate stage, as things go from development to stable. This was the case before switching to a rolling release; which, essentially made the problem worse by removing beta.
I find myself going back and finding an previous .smx binary under 1.6.4, because something major like function arguments aren't functioning properly after recompiling under 1.7.2. It's virtually impossible to diagnose this issue because the compiler just passes through flawlessly and the wrong errors appears to be happening in error logs. In my opinion, the entire 1.7 branch is in more of a beta state than anything else. This is demonstrated by all the bugs getting fixed in the aftermath; And is detrimental to certain people who need constant stability. |
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
As has been said hundreds of times now, the "stable" and "dev" labels are to do with API stability and nothing to do with bugs or issues - both branches are "stable" in the sense that all known issues are fixed ASAP and if they can't be the changes that caused them are backed out.
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
All binaries compiled before 1.7 are compatible with 1.7 and later, with the exception of a few that are doing things they shouldn't have been (specifically relating to datapacks). Being unable to compile a pre-1.7 plugin using the 1.7 compiler is another matter entirely.
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
this bug? - changes last github commits not show in main page snapshots, and links.
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Can I expect metamod to also come at a rolling release cycle "soon" or not for a few months?
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Can we get a URL that always returns the latest release?
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
http://www.sourcemod.net/downloads.php?branch=stable |
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
If so, here's psychonic's reply to that: https://forums.alliedmods.net/showpo...2&postcount=17 |
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
Code:
lynx -dump www.sourcemod.net/downloads.php?branch=stable | egrep -o "http:.*sourcemod-.*-linux.*" | sort -n | tail -1 |
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Here's how you can download the latest version from smdrop without dependencies like lynx.
Code:
wget "http://www.sourcemod.net/smdrop/1.8/$(wget -qO- "http://www.sourcemod.net/smdrop/1.8/" | grep linux | cut -d "\"" -f 2 | tail -n 1)" Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
When I said it was complex, I was referring to having a dynamic web link that would redirect to the latest download file (with untouched filename, including the build number). I'm still not completely sold on the idea of having a programmatic way to download the latest build as I believe you should know what you're downloading, not just grabbing it because it's new. Regardless, it's very clear that it's a feature people want and are just going to scrape the downloads page or file list to get it if not provided another solution. I'll try to have something implemented this week. |
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
http://sourcemod.net/latest.php?os=<os>&version=<majorVersion> Valid OS strings are: windows, linux, mac Valid versions at time of writing are: 1.7, 1.8 |
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Am I going insane, or have the linux downloads at https://www.sourcemod.net/downloads.php all become archives of archives? The windows & mac ones seem fine.
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Quote:
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
Great change details :P
|
Re: Changes - Part 2: Rolling Release Cycle
I am also like this update. This is very easier for people to work with game server.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:42. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.