Aimbot module
I have moved the aimbot module discussion into it's own thread.
|
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
1 Attachment(s)
My results in 2 days test the aimbot, I attached the file smac.log
|
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
Quote:
Edit: One guy had it trigger 3 times at once. Must be a nade kill or something. Might be a bug. |
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
No, some of which have been detected are regulars on the server, others I do not know.
|
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
example from our server:
L 05/24/2011 - 19:07:08: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (156 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:07:35: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (155 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:08:22: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (156 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:11:21: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:03: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:15: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:17: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:20: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:23: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 19:12:44: p!nK.LaMa (ID: STEAM_0:1:12906641 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (149 degree snap) This Player was using an real Aimbot and many more players are detected! |
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
For me the one who made the biggest impact is:
Quote:
If you can say what you think. |
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
Yea, I get 1 to 3 detections randomly on some people but when there is a real aimbotter, Ill have like 15 lines altogether of that single person.
|
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
Quote:
http://sourceban.team-wb.de/getdemo.php?type=B&id=18395 |
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
Another example:
L 05/24/2011 - 00:33:42: RAMPAGING BULL >_< (ID: STEAM_0:1:33863687 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (91 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 00:49:19: RAMPAGING BULL >_< (ID: STEAM_0:1:33863687 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (60 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 01:06:09: RAMPAGING BULL >_< (ID: STEAM_0:1:33863687 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (86 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 01:11:33: RAMPAGING BULL >_< (ID: STEAM_0:1:33863687 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (82 degree snap) L 05/24/2011 - 01:11:35: RAMPAGING BULL >_< (ID: STEAM_0:1:33863687 | IP: XXXXXXXXXXXX) is suspected of having an aimbot (87 degree snap) Demo can be Downloaded here: http://sourceban.team-wb.de/getdemo.php?type=B&id=18389 |
Re: Feeback SMAC r107/r115
Yes I believe you, you seen to be on the ^^
So through these examples we see how an aimbot can be detected with several lines of detection over a period of time |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:13. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.