[Vet]

While modifying the stock mapchooser plugin, I noticed some code that didn't seem quite right. In the public checkVotes() routine, if more players choose NONE (or basically 'nextmap') than EXTEND, the routine will still end up performing an EXTEND. This is because the routine returns after checking the EXTEND vote and never bothers to check to see if perhaps NONE had more votes then EXTEND.

For example, if the map voting went like this...
mapname1 got 2 votes
mapname2 got 0 votes
mapname3 got 1 vote
mapname4 got 1 vote
mapname5 got 1 vote

Extend got 3 votes
None got 4 votes
...the routing will still extend the map even though NONE got more votes.

Please note that I haven't tested it, and forgive for wasting your time if I'm wrong, but that's sure the way it looks to me.

public checkVotes()
{
new b = 0
 
for (new a = 0; a < g_mapVoteNum; ++a)
  if (g_voteCount[b] < g_voteCount[a])
    b = a
 
if (g_voteCount[SELECTMAPS] > g_voteCount[b])
{
  new mapname[32]
  get_mapname(mapname, 31)
  new Float:steptime = get_cvar_float("amx_extendmap_step")
  set_cvar_float("mp_timelimit", get_cvar_float("mp_timelimit") + steptime)
  client_print(0, print_chat, "%L", LANG_PLAYER, "CHO_FIN_EXT", steptime)
  log_amx("Vote: Voting for the nextmap finished. Map %s will be extended to next %.0f minutes", mapname, steptime)
 
  return
}
 
if (g_voteCount[b] && g_voteCount[SELECTMAPS + 1] <= g_voteCount[b])
  set_cvar_string("amx_nextmap", g_mapName[g_nextName[b]])
 
new smap[32]
 
get_cvar_string("amx_nextmap", smap, 31)
client_print(0, print_chat, "%L", LANG_PLAYER, "CHO_FIN_NEXT", smap)
log_amx("Vote: Voting for the nextmap finished. The nextmap will be %s", smap)
}